The assignment for our journalism class was to decide whether or not to run a series of very graphic photos. Here are the questions I need to answer:
Would you run these photos?
Only the first one.
What criteria did you you use to make a decision?
Most of the photos were simply too horrifying to consider.
Under what circumstances would you run the photos?
I probably wouldn't run the photo at a small local paper.
Would your decision be different if the events were local?
I still wouldn't run any of the rest of them.
Does where or how you play the photo have any bearing on your decision?
I think it could have some bearing on my decision in certain instances, but
not in any of these pictures.
With which photo did you struggle the most? Why
I thought about the final picture because the victim's face was obscured,
but I tried to picture it in a respectable newspaper and couldn't do
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment