Sunday, September 28, 2008
Love Journalism Blogs
This summer, I discovered a wonderful blog called Regret the Error. It's a site that highlights errors made by magazines and newspapers. Some of the errors are funny; some are pathetic. I thought I'd just highlight a number-related mistake: The Reason, for some reason, used outdated census data for a story in the August/September issue ranking of 35 largest cities in terms of personal freedoms. Apparently, Oklahoma City, Tucson, Albuquerque and Fresno should have replaced Miami, Kansas City, Oakland and Cleveland. Ooops.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
LA Times Staffers Sue Sam Zell
Current and former Los Angeles Times workers are suing the Tribune Company and various head honchos like owner Sam Zell, for allegedly creating a business plan that wrecked the company. The suit, which is available here, said:
Is Zell just doing what needs to be done? Is malice involved? Or is it just good business?
Go.
Zell and his accessories threaten to destroy the Tribune Company and its assets, which include some of the nation's oldest and best daily newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, and the Baltimore Sun, along with several other great daily newspapers.
Is Zell just doing what needs to be done? Is malice involved? Or is it just good business?
Go.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Outsourcing Editing
On its face, it may not seem like a terrible idea:
Outsourcing editing might put some of our more under-appreciated newspaper employees out of work, but it may stave of what many predict to be impending doom for newspapers.
But according to an E&P article from nearly three weeks ago, there is nothing that would indicate that this drastic move would do much to make a dent into this major problem. E&P reports:
Outsourcing editing might put some of our more under-appreciated newspaper employees out of work, but it may stave of what many predict to be impending doom for newspapers.
But according to an E&P article from nearly three weeks ago, there is nothing that would indicate that this drastic move would do much to make a dent into this major problem. E&P reports:
Plus, I have to say there's nothing quite like having that seasoned night editor looking over your copy right in front of you--almost daring you to get something wrong. The intimidation makes the journalists better. It makes the newspaper better.
Steven S. Duke, an associate professor at the Medill School of Journalism who works with newspapers as managing director for training at the Readership Institute, isn't so sure the industry has gotten the message, even now. "I haven't seen anything I would call radical, despite all the talk," he asserts. At Institute training sessions, he has noticed a change in demands that tells him newspapers are still not ready for fundamental change: "They used to say, 'Tell me who's doing this, and if it's working to increase readership.' Now what they say is, 'Tell me who's doing this — and making money at it.' Everyone wants promises that risks they take will bring in dollars — and, of course, nobody can do that."
Blogging as an occupation
This is what my friend said to me after I jokingly listed my occupation as "blogger" on a reference form I filled out on his behalf:
I guess not all of us can be bloggers--oh wait, we can.
I guess not all of us can be bloggers--oh wait, we can.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Campus papers feel the pinch
Independent student newspapers, those idyllic institutions that offer a somewhat controlled environment where aspiring journalists learn the trade and sharpen their skills, are cutting back on the number of editions they publish. Inside Higher Ed is reporting that The Daily Californian at the University of California at Berkeley and The Daily Orange of Syracuse University will move from five editions each week to printing four. The papers cite dwindling advertising as the cause.
When campus papers with comparatively low costs and a relatively captive audience can't even make it, what does it say about the future of the industry?
When campus papers with comparatively low costs and a relatively captive audience can't even make it, what does it say about the future of the industry?
Saturday, September 6, 2008
SPJ, hey hey
I'm just wrapping up a stint working at The Working Press, the newspaper of the Society of Professional Journalist's annual convention. I covered a variety of different issues and seminars at the event. Check out our publication.
One thing that concerned me when I attended what the attitude of most of the newspaper reporters. Nearly every person I talked to who worked for a paper was overworked, underpaid and afraid they'll lose their jobs. One of the most popular sessions at the convention was about freelancing. I bet people signed up for it because they were looking for ways to supplement their incomes.
The president and CEO of Scripps said in a session that the next five years will be an exciting time in journalism--for some people. While he said that it was the young people in journalism now who would benefit from our field being turned upside down, it is sad that some of the people who would have been great mentors will be pushed into other fields.
One thing that concerned me when I attended what the attitude of most of the newspaper reporters. Nearly every person I talked to who worked for a paper was overworked, underpaid and afraid they'll lose their jobs. One of the most popular sessions at the convention was about freelancing. I bet people signed up for it because they were looking for ways to supplement their incomes.
The president and CEO of Scripps said in a session that the next five years will be an exciting time in journalism--for some people. While he said that it was the young people in journalism now who would benefit from our field being turned upside down, it is sad that some of the people who would have been great mentors will be pushed into other fields.
Monday, September 1, 2008
The Office: metaphor for American journalism
The state of the newspaper industry remind me an episode of The Office, a prime time “mockumentary” on NBC that follows the lives of office workers toiling away at a failing Scranton, Penn.-based paper supply company.
In the episode, the bumbling and inept head of the office Michael guest lectures at a business school, where he struggles to explain why regional paper companies are still relevant in "an increasingly paperless world."
"Real business is done on paper--OK? Write that down," he says, as the camera pans to the class clicking away, taking notes on their computers.
Too many newspapers act as Michael does. They suffer from such tunnel vision that they can’t seem to accurately assess and react to their abysmal situations. Journalism is rapidly changing, and these newspapers try to cope by resorting to outdated technologies and belief systems.
Vin Crosbie discusses this in his media industry consulting company’s blog: Digital Deliverance. In the first two parts of a three-part series (the third part has yet to be posted), he explores why newspapers are struggling. He said that many strategies associated with buzzwords like multimedia or convergence are just Band-Aids. It isn’t enough to simply throw in-print stories onto outdated and confusing Web sites. Media organizations don’t understand that people don’t access journalism in the same way they did 50 years ago.
Fewer people have an allegiance to a specific publication. In Chicago, there were “Tribune families” or “Sun-Times families.” People identified with their newspapers. Now, more people simply Google the news they want to know about and are directed to a Web site with that information.
In addition, there’s the Drudge Report, which does all the searching for you. Matt Drudge links to news stories from all over the world that he finds to be the most salient. The Drudge Report rarely does its own reporting.
The Internet gives people the opportunity to get information from sites that focus on certain interests. For example, people craving news related to the environment can subscribe to the Web-only publication: Greenwire. People into Washington politics can check out the sites of publications at which I used to work: Congressional Quarterly’s free site or the Chicago Tribune Washington Bureau’s blog The Swamp. There are even media gossip sites like Fishbowl LA.
But I would disagree with Crosbie's suggestion that people like Sam Zell are “infatuated” with the business so they are buying media conglomerates to stave off the impending doom of newspapers. If there's one thing I know from listening to Zell speak while I interned at the Chicago Tribune's Washington bureau during the 2008 spring semester, it's that he has no interest in maintaining the status quo.
There will always be a place for journalism. But where that place is will change drastically in the next ten years. And those who cling to broadsheets like security blankets will have trouble waking up to the reality of the industry.
In the episode, the bumbling and inept head of the office Michael guest lectures at a business school, where he struggles to explain why regional paper companies are still relevant in "an increasingly paperless world."
"Real business is done on paper--OK? Write that down," he says, as the camera pans to the class clicking away, taking notes on their computers.
Too many newspapers act as Michael does. They suffer from such tunnel vision that they can’t seem to accurately assess and react to their abysmal situations. Journalism is rapidly changing, and these newspapers try to cope by resorting to outdated technologies and belief systems.
Vin Crosbie discusses this in his media industry consulting company’s blog: Digital Deliverance. In the first two parts of a three-part series (the third part has yet to be posted), he explores why newspapers are struggling. He said that many strategies associated with buzzwords like multimedia or convergence are just Band-Aids. It isn’t enough to simply throw in-print stories onto outdated and confusing Web sites. Media organizations don’t understand that people don’t access journalism in the same way they did 50 years ago.
Fewer people have an allegiance to a specific publication. In Chicago, there were “Tribune families” or “Sun-Times families.” People identified with their newspapers. Now, more people simply Google the news they want to know about and are directed to a Web site with that information.
In addition, there’s the Drudge Report, which does all the searching for you. Matt Drudge links to news stories from all over the world that he finds to be the most salient. The Drudge Report rarely does its own reporting.
The Internet gives people the opportunity to get information from sites that focus on certain interests. For example, people craving news related to the environment can subscribe to the Web-only publication: Greenwire. People into Washington politics can check out the sites of publications at which I used to work: Congressional Quarterly’s free site or the Chicago Tribune Washington Bureau’s blog The Swamp. There are even media gossip sites like Fishbowl LA.
But I would disagree with Crosbie's suggestion that people like Sam Zell are “infatuated” with the business so they are buying media conglomerates to stave off the impending doom of newspapers. If there's one thing I know from listening to Zell speak while I interned at the Chicago Tribune's Washington bureau during the 2008 spring semester, it's that he has no interest in maintaining the status quo.
There will always be a place for journalism. But where that place is will change drastically in the next ten years. And those who cling to broadsheets like security blankets will have trouble waking up to the reality of the industry.
Labels:
CQ,
Media,
The Office,
Tribune,
Vin Crosbie,
Zell
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)